The three GPT models
Exact model IDs and per-token prices are on the Pricing page at www.ruapi.ai. New versions appear in the catalog automatically.
Versatile and well-supported
The main reason to reach for GPT isn’t a peak score in one narrow area — it’s that it handles almost any task with equal confidence: code, analysis, chat, extraction, summarization. You never have to remember “what this model is good at.”- Ecosystem — GPT is the most common backend, so nearly every library, framework and no-code tool is written against it. Whatever you integrate, the GPT path is usually the best-trodden one.
- OpenAI-compatible protocol — RuAPI serves the models in that same format, so any OpenAI SDK works. Only
base_urlchanges. - Reliable function calling — GPT consistently returns structured tool calls, the basis for agents (see function calling for an example).
- Vision — you can pass images as input: screenshots, diagrams, scans (see image input).
When to pick GPT (and when another line)
GPT is a strong default. Here’s the honest picture of where it stops being the best pick:- Pick GPT when you want an all-rounder, maximum tool compatibility, or you simply don’t want to guess — gpt-5.4 covers most scenarios.
- Claude is often more careful in long agentic chains and across large codebases.
- Gemini wins on very long context and multimodal tasks with heavy input.
- DeepSeek is attractive when cost at scale drives the decision and hard reasoning isn’t critical.
One key covers all lines. You can switch freely between GPT, Claude, Gemini and DeepSeek within a single project — only the
model value changes.Connecting GPT
GPT speaks the OpenAI-compatible protocol, so any OpenAI SDK or a tool like Cursor, Cline or n8n works. You only need to pointbase_url at RuAPI:
Next
Connect and first request
base_url, key, Python and curl code.
Claude models
Same key — when agent precision matters more.
Gemini models
Very long context and multimodality.